Additional fuel is evaluated as economical to carry forward.
FUEL OPTIMIZATION
Optimize the fuel strategy across the entire mission.
Bring the flight plan. FuelOptix builds the fuel strategy—using mission requirements, economics, aircraft constraints, and downstream needs to evaluate the lowest-cost evaluated valid mission plan.
MISSION REQUIREMENTS
KDAL → KTEB→FUELOPTIX EVALUATES→FUEL STRATEGY
Mission planning inputs remain distinct from FuelOptix analysis.MISSION FUEL OPTIMIZATION
Operational fuel requirements in. Explainable fuel decisions out.
FuelOptix works from the mission’s requirements. Fuel on Board, route, aircraft, fuel economics, and downstream needs remain visible alongside the resulting Recommended Purchase, Fuel at Departure, Projected Landing Fuel, and evaluated warnings.
01 · MISSION REQUIREMENTSMission planning inputsKDAL → KTEB
→GLEX · 1,286 NM · FL450 · 2:58
PLANNED TRIP FUEL10,198 lbs
PLANNED LANDING FUEL5,000 lbs
02 · FUELOPTIX EVALUATES
→Fuel PriceFBO FeesHandling FeesFuel Required to Waive FeesDownstream Fuel PricesIncremental Carrying BurnAircraft Weight & Fuel LimitsFuel Already On BoardDownstream Mission Requirements
03 · OPTIMIZED FUEL STRATEGY
WHERE TO BUY
Evaluate eligible airport / FBO options
HOW MUCH TO BUY
Determine the recommended uplift
WHAT TO CARRY FORWARD
Evaluate economical tankering across the mission
TOTAL MISSION ECONOMICS
Compare the lowest-cost evaluated valid mission plan with the baseline
FUEL STRATEGY, NOT FLIGHT PLANNING
Bring the flight plan. FuelOptix builds the fuel strategy.
FuelOptix combines mission fuel requirements with airport pricing, FBO economics, aircraft constraints, and downstream mission needs to evaluate where fuel should be purchased and how much should be carried forward.
- Mission planning inputs remain distinct from FuelOptix analysis.
- Minimum Landing Fuel remains a pilot / operational input.
- Projected Landing Fuel is a calculated planning result.
- Warnings stay connected to the evaluated plan.
FUEL FLOW
Fuel on Board+Recommended Purchase=Fuel at Departure
Fuel at Departure−Estimated Burn=Projected Landing Fuel
KEEP THE MODEL CLEAR
Requirements and outcomes are different things.
- Minimum Landing Fuel
- A pilot / operator operational input. FuelOptix does not overwrite it.
- Projected Landing Fuel
- A calculated planning result from the evaluated fuel strategy.
- Tankered Above Minimum
- Fuel carried beyond the operational requirement because the evaluated mission plan supports it.
MULTI-LEG TANKERING
Fuel carries forward. The decision should too.
Leg 1 Projected Landing Fuel becomes Leg 2 Fuel on Board, and that relationship continues throughout the itinerary. FuelOptix evaluates whether carrying fuel forward remains economical after incremental carrying burn, fuel prices, FBO economics, and downstream requirements.
It does not simply buy all fuel at the cheapest airport—or buy only the minimum required amount.
AIRCRAFT CONSTRAINTS
Every evaluated plan stays within the aircraft’s limits.
FuelOptix retains MTOW, MLW, MZFW, and maximum fuel-capacity checks while it evaluates the commercial options. A lower cost is only meaningful if the plan remains valid.
FuelOptix fuel-burn and performance estimates are prototype planning logic, not validated operational aircraft-performance data.
MTOWMLWMZFWFUEL CAPACITY
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Clear operating guidance for each leg.
The plan purchases only what is needed for the leg’s operational requirement.
Carried-forward fuel satisfies the next leg’s requirement.
Explore the supplier, fee, waiver, and pricing economics behind a fuel strategy.
Explore Fuel Intelligence →SEE FUELOPTIX IN YOUR OPERATION